Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 16:56

Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
How do you make a karaoke version of a song?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Netflix anime boosts Devil May Cry 5 sales to over 10m - Eurogamer
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
SEC clears Trump Media filing, opening door to multi-billion-dollar Bitcoin buy - The Block
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Death threats to Astros pitcher Lance McCullers Jr. came from "overseas" resident - NBC Sports
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sly Stone: Funk Revolutionary - The Free Press
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Why are you a Muslim? Why is it Islam for you and not something else?